• Home
  • RTC Projects: SSR1

SSR-1. A Systematic Scoping Review of the Literature on Risks for Institutionalization of People with Disabilities

The purpose of this project is to identify gaps in the research literature regarding barriers to remaining in the community for people with severe disabilities age 18-65 (versus senior citizens).

Living and participating in the community is recognized as the “gold standard” of outcome measurement in disability and rehabilitation. Still, institutionalization in congregate care facilities, nursing homes, and other health and community institutions threatens continuity of community living for many adults with disabilities under age 65.

NIDRR recognizes the importance of community living in its Long Range Plan and centers for independent living (CILs) increasingly acknowledge deinstitutionalization of people with disabilities as a “fifth core service.”

Reasons for institutionalization include personal factors, such as lack of advocacy skills or incontinence; environmental factors, such as lack of qualified personal attendants and inadequate appropriate health care services; and policy factors (an environmental subset) such as a Medicaid bias requiring individuals to enter institutions to receive needed care.

The issue is complicated by the frequent intertwining of personal and environmental factors: for example, an individual can manage incontinence using technology, but funding for technology may be disputed by health care providers. Some institutionalization risk factors for working-aged people with disabilities may be similar to those affecting the aging population, but others may be different.

It is hypothesized that most seniors have extensive experience living in the community, established social relationships, and more resources due to increased years of work. In contrast, adults with disabilities under age 65 often experience attitudinal, physical and programmatic barriers to community living; lack of opportunity to form social relationships; and limited employment prospects.

Emphasis on deinstitutionalization of people with disabilities was heightened by the Supreme Court’s decision in Olmstead v. L.C., which found that the Americans with Disabilities Act Title II mandate of services provided in integrated settings was not being implemented in many communities. Yet, despite the importance of deinstitutionalization and its potential life-changing and often irreversible effects for many people with disabilities, there has been no systematic investigation of the factors that put community-living individuals at risk for institutionalization.

Purpose of the Review
Consolidating and summarizing current knowledge and identifying gaps in the literature regarding risk factors for institutionalization can assist in establishing a baseline and setting the agenda for further research. A systematic scoping literature review can fill this void.

People with disabilities and their advocates will be involved in shaping the review to ensure that it is relevant and complete.

Anticipated Outcomes
We expect to produce a review that identifies risk factors for institutionalization of working-aged people with disabilities and facilitates increased capacity to target research on this topic. The systematic scoping review results will be provided to other RTC/CL researchers to inform their interventions in subsequent years of the Center’s work, and will be made available to other disability researchers.

The review will also be written up in brief, snapshot format for use by consumer advocates, advocacy organizations, and policy makers in advocacy efforts and policy formation.

More information on the design of the review:
Studying Risk Factors for Institutionalization; Study Design and Procedures

Project Investigators:
Glen White, PhD, Megan O’Brien, PhD, Dot Nary, PhD, and Amalia Monroe-Gluck, MS 

COVID-19 Vaccine information in plain language: https://t.co/UXHOj9w1HE

woman standing with walker

Meet the advisors for SSR-1.

Image provided by the Florida Office on Disability and Health

One of 34 U.S. public institutions in the prestigious Association of American Universities
44 nationally ranked graduate programs.
—U.S. News & World Report
Top 50 nationwide for size of library collection.
5th nationwide for service to veterans —"Best for Vets: Colleges," Military Times
KU Today